The lifecycle it carries

Every stage below runs in the same system, so the record builds itself as the work happens.

  1. 1 · Apply

    Mobile-first applicant portal with save-and-resume, document upload, and status visibility — plus an in-portal assistant for eligibility and document questions, with a route to a human on every answer.

  2. 2 · Review & award

    One staff queue from Received through Board Review to Awarded. Award letters generate from the grant record; agreements are signed electronically (DocuSign) and the signed document returns to the file.

  3. 3 · Monitor

    Guided post-award sequence — acknowledgment, agreement, tax and banking documents — plus repeatable, versioned document requests with correspondence records. Staff can file documents on an applicant’s behalf.

  4. 4 · Report & close

    Grantees file progress and final reports straight into the grant record. Leadership sees budgeted vs. awarded vs. remaining by program area, and core records export in open formats — the client owns its data.

The working screens

Captured from the OlenGrants demonstration configuration — same deployed code as production, fictional sample data throughout.

OlenGrants staff review pipeline — one queue carrying every application from Received through Under Review, Board Review, and Awarded, with assigned reviewer, community, amount requested, and cycle budget remaining.
Staff review pipeline — intake through decision in one queue

All organizations, communities, reviewers, and dollar amounts are fictional sample data — not client records.

OlenGrants grants-budget board — total budget, awarded to date, remaining to grant, and allocated versus awarded by program area on one screen.
Grants-budget board — “where are we against the budget we set?” on one screen

A reporting layer over the grant records — your accounting system stays authoritative. Fictional sample data shown.

OlenGrants impact view — where funding landed by community, portfolio totals, and allocation by focus area.
Impact view — where the funding landed, by community and focus area

The screen that answers whether a program is actually reaching the communities it is meant to reach — during the cycle, not in a year-end report. Fictional sample data shown.

Why small programs pick it over national platforms

  • Built and operated, not licensed — OlenArc runs the platform with your program. Rule changes are configuration, not a support ticket to a national vendor.
  • Fixed annual fee — no per-seat licensing, so involving more reviewers, staff, or community participants never costs extra.
  • Designed for hard geography — mobile-first and low-bandwidth by default, with phone-assisted routes and staff able to file documents on an applicant’s behalf. Built serving communities off the road system.
  • The record builds itself — who reviewed what, what was requested, what was received: captured as work happens, so the program file is audit-ready without anyone assembling it later.
  • You can leave — core grant records and reporting datasets export in open formats. Changing administrators never costs the program its history.

Deployed proof

Arctic Slope Community Foundation

Full-lifecycle grant platform in production since July 2026, serving applicant organizations across all 8 North Slope Iñupiat villages — replacing a national commercial grants product. Applicant portal, staff review, e-signature awards, post-award monitoring, grantee reporting, and budget tracking in one system.

See the full case study →

Running a grant program on spreadsheets and email?

Tell us about your program — cycle count, award volume, and where it hurts. We’ll show you the working platform on fictional data and come back with a scoped proposal.